HomePage >> Journals >> Biotechnology Frontier

Biotechnology Frontier

Biotechnology Frontier (Yearly) is an international comprehensive professional academic journal of Ivy Publisher, concerning the development of biotechnology technology. The main focus of the journal is the academic papers, comments and research review of latest improvement in the fields of Biotechnology technology, microorganism, medicine, agriculture & forestry, edible fungus, light food, environmental protection and related, aiming at... [More] Biotechnology Frontier (Yearly) is an international comprehensive professional academic journal of Ivy Publisher, concerning the development of biotechnology technology. The main focus of the journal is the academic papers, comments and research review of latest improvement in the fields of Biotechnology technology, microorganism, medicine, agriculture & forestry, edible fungus, light food, environmental protection and related, aiming at providing a good communication platform to transfer, share and discuss the theoretical and technical development of electrical theory development for professionals, scholars, researchers and administrative staffs in this field, reflecting the academic front level, promote academic change and foster the development of biotechnology technology.

The journal receives manuscripts written in Chinese or English. As for Chinese papers, the following items in English are indispensible parts of the paper: paper title, author(s), author(s)'affiliation(s), abstract and keywords. If this is the first time you contribute an article to the journal, please format your manuscript as per the sample paper and then submit it into the online submission system. Accepted papers will immediately appear online followed by printed hard copies by Ivy Publisher globally. Therefore, the contributions should not be related to secret. The author takes sole responsibility for his views.

ISSN Print:2327-0837

ISSN Online:2327-0888

Email:bf@ivypub.org

Website: http://www.ivypub.org/bf/

  0
  0

Paper Infomation

Analysis of Multimodal Analgesic Nursing in Gynecological Laparoscopic Postoperative Patients

Full Text(PDF, 588KB)

Author: Min Huang

Abstract: Objective: To explore the application effect of multimodal analgesic nursing in patients after gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and analyze its impact on pain control, postoperative recovery, and complications. Methods: A total of 86 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in the gynecology department of our hospital from May 2024 to January 2025 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group (43 cases, multimodal analgesic nursing) and a control group (43 cases, conventional single analgesic nursing) using a random number table. The control group received intramuscular injection of pethidine for on-demand analgesia after surgery, while the observation group received multimodal analgesic nursing, including preoperative analgesic education and oral celecoxib pretreatment, intraoperative local infiltration anesthesia of the incision, and postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia combined with oral ibuprofen and non-pharmacological analgesia. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores, postoperative recovery indicators (time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay), incidence of analgesic-related complications (nausea and vomiting, dizziness, skin itching), and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Independent samples t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and χ² tests were used for data analysis, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: ① Pain scores: The VAS scores in the observation group at 6h, 12h, 24h, and 48h after surgery were 2.3±0.8, 1.8±0.6, 1.5±0.5, and 1.2±0.4, respectively, all significantly lower than those in the control group at the same time points (4.5±1.1, 3.8±0.9, 3.2±0.7, and 2.5±0.6) (P<0.05); ② Recovery indicators: The time to first ambulation (10.5±2.1h), time to first flatus (16.8±3.0h), and length of hospital stay (2.9±0.7d) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (22.3±3.5h, 26.5±4.2h, and 5.1±1.0d) (P<0.05); ③ Complications: The incidence of analgesic-related complications in the observation group (6.98%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (23.26%) (P<0.05); ④ Nursing satisfaction: The satisfaction rate in the observation group (97.67%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.40%) (P<0.05). Conclusion: Multimodal analgesic nursing can effectively reduce postoperative pain levels in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients, accelerate recovery, lower the risk of analgesic-related complications, and improve nursing satisfaction, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Keywords: Multimodal Analgesic Nursing; Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery; Postoperative Pain; VAS Score; Postoperative Recovery

References:

[1] 张艳静,朱元嵩,黄可可,等.颊针疗法联合腹横筋膜阻滞镇痛方法对腹腔镜妇科手术患者镇痛效果及术后应激反应的影响[J].河北中医,2025,47(07):1172-1176.

[2] 侯坤,郭俊,于飞.快速康复外科实践中妇科腹腔镜术后腹壁Trocar穿刺孔疼痛的动态观察[J].中国医药,2025,20(07):1053-1057.

[3] 黄欣星,黄钰容,厉瑶.羟考酮与布托啡诺在妇科腹腔镜手术后的镇痛效果与安全性比较[J].浙江创伤外科,2025,30(06):1189-1191.

[4] 王廷月,旷昕.对乙酰氨基酚甘露醇注射液联合腰方肌阻滞用于妇科腹腔镜术后镇痛的效果观察[J].广东医科大学学报,2025,43(04):426-432.

[5] 高冉.小剂量艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜子宫手术患者术后镇痛效果和睡眠质量的影响[D].宁夏医科大学,2025.

[6] 杨勇,杨昌勇.超声引导下腹横筋膜平面阻滞应用于妇科急腹症腹腔镜术后镇痛效果分析[J].中华灾害救援医学,2025,12(02):177-180.

[7] 彭通.腹横筋膜平面阻滞与椎旁神经阻滞用于妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛的效果及安全性比较[J].山西医药杂志,2025,54(04):248-251.

[8] 周斐,马春宇,常梦,等.超声引导腹直肌鞘阻滞联合羟考酮用于妇科单孔腹腔镜术后患者的自控镇痛效果[J].河南外科学杂志,2024,30(06):71-73.

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2011-2025 Ivy Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

Contact: customer@ivypub.org