Paper Infomation
Comparative Study of Chemical Composition and Texture Profile Analysis between Camembert Cheese and Chinese Sufu
Full Text(PDF, 1686KB)
Author: Liying Li, Jianming Wang
Abstract: Chinese sufu and camembert cheese were similar in the proc essing technology and final appearan ce. The study was a comparative analysis of common soft ripened cheeses and Chinese traditional fermented soybean products on the market. The result of chemical analyses revealed that cheese’s moisture(61.63%), pH(6.41), protein(23.16%), and fat(24.33%)were higher than sufu’s moisture(52.76%), pH(6.31), protein(14.87%) and fat(10.34%), while cheese’s amino acid nitrogen(1.36mg/g) and salt(1.21%) were lower than sufu’s amino acid nitrogen (6.64 mg/g) and salt (8.21%). Although Chinese sufu’s the total amoun t of free amino acids (147.93mg/g) were lower th an camembert cheese’ (90.28mg/g), the types were more complete. Texture profile analysis of the camembert cheese and Chinese sufu showed that all of the indicators of cheese we re higher than sufu. The chewiness (81.23g) , adhesiveness (-42.24g.sec), c ohesiveness (0.69), springiness (0.75) and resilience (0.27) were higher than the sufu’s chewiness (29.65g), adhesiveness (-281.52 g.sec), cohesiveness (0.45), springiness (0.65) and resilience (0.084), and the significant difference was very. However, the hardness of cheese (155.89g) and sufu (95.10g) was significant difference.
Keywords: Camembert cheese; Chinese Sufu; Texture profile analysis; Chemical analyses
References:
[1] Abidodun, S., Anthony, O., & Omolara, T.I. (1999). Biochemical composition of infant weaning food fabricated form fermented blends of cereal and soybean . Food Chem., 65, 35-39.
[2] AOAC (2000), Official methods of analysis of AOAC In ternational 17th ed. Gaithersburg, Md.: AOAC Ind.
[3] Bárcenas P, Perez- Elortondo FJ, Albisu M (2007). An international ring trial for the ripeni ng evaluation of raw ewes’ milk cheese texture. Int Dairy J 17:1139-1147.
[4] Bourne MC (1978) Texture profile analysis. Food Technol 32:62-66.
[5] Han, B.Z., Rijkelt R. Beumer, Frans M. & Nout, M.J.R.A (20 01). Microbiological safety an d quality of commercial sufu- a Chinese fermented soybean food. Food Control, 12(2001), 541-547.
[6] Han, B.Z., Rombouts, F.M. & Nout, M. J.R.A. (2001). Chinese fermented soybean food. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 65, 1–10
[7] IDF (2008), cheese--determination of fat content-Van Gulik method. IDF Standard 222. Brussels, Beigrum: ind.
[8] Graser, T. A.; Godel, H.; Albers, S.; Foldi, P.; Furst, P. An ultra rapid and sensitive high-pe rformance liquid chromatographic method for determination of tissue and plasma fre e amino acids. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 151, 142–152
[9] Na Zhang. Xin-Huai Zhao(2010).Study of Mucor spp. In semi-hard cheese ripening. J Food Sci Technol (Nov-Dec 2010) 47(6):613-619.
[10] Newman, Daniel. (1983). Man the Menu. Saturday Evening Post.vol.255, No.4 (pp.68-69).
[11] Sarker, P.K, Jones, L.j., Craven, G.S., Somerset, S.M., & Palmer, C(1997).Amino acid profiles of kinema, a soybean-fermented food. Food Chem., 59, 69-75.
[12] Steinkraus K.H.(1997).Classification of Fermented Foods ：Worldwide Review of Household Fermentation Techniques．Food Control,8:311-317.
[13] Steinkraus, K. H. (1996). Chinese sufu. In K. H. Steinkraus (Ed.), Handbook of indigenous fermented foods (pp. 633–641). New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker.
[14] Su, Y. C. (1986). Sufu. In N. R. Reddy, M. D. Pierson, &D. K. Salunkhe (Eds.), Legume-based fermented foods (pp. 69-83).Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.
[15] Wang, H.L,&Hesseltine, C.W.(1970). Sufu and Lao-Chao. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 18(4), 572-575.
[16] Yong-Qiang Cheng, Qing Hu(2009). Prodution of sufu, a traditional Chinese fermented soybean food , by fermentation with Mucor flavus at low temperature.F ood Sci.Technol.Res.,15(4),347-352.
[17] Zhao X.H, Zheng X.T. (2009) .A primary study on texture modification and proteolysis of mao-tofu during its fermentation. Afr J Biotechnol 8:2294–2300