Paper Infomation
Impact of Applying Focused Solution Care under the Risk Grading Model on Quality of Life and Lung Function in Patients with Bronchial Asthma (BA)
Full Text(PDF, 60KB)
Author: Xueqin Ji
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of applying focused solution-focused care (SFA) in a risk-graded model on quality of life and lung function in patients with bronchial asthma (BA). Methods: Eighty-five BA patients admitted to our hospital between 2023.8 and 2024.8 were selected and divided into a control group (routine care, n=42) and a study group (SFA under the risk grading model, n=43) according to a randomized numerical table method, comparing the study participants in terms of clinical symptomatic improvement, quality of life, lung function, and medical compliance behaviour. Results: The study group's shortness of breath, cough, breath-holding, and chest tightness improved in less time than that of the control group (P < 0.05); before the intervention, there was no difference (P > 0.05) in the comparison of the subjects' adherence to exercise scores, activity limitation scores, lung capacity (FVC), self-management scores, asthma symptom scores, sensible diet scores, psychoemotional scores, forceful expiratory volume at the 1st second (FEV1), response to stimuli scores, self-health concern scores, on-time There was no difference in the medication taking score and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (P > 0.05); after the intervention, the study group's FVC level, self-management score, psychoemotional score, activity limitation score, adherence to exercise score, FEV1 level, response to stimulus score, reasonable diet score, asthma symptom score, PEFR level, self-health care score, and medication taking on time were higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). P < 0.05). Conclusion: SFA in a risk-graded model improves clinical symptoms, lung function, quality of life and compliance behaviour in patients with BA.
Keywords: Bronchial Asthma; Risk Grading Model; Focused Solution Nursing; Quality of Life
References:
[1] 闵思文,何龑,黎金玲.聚焦解决模式护理对支气管哮喘患者肺功能及生活质量的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2022,41(15):2855-2859.
[2] 张静,魏军,龚玉蕾.支气管哮喘患者合并焦虑/抑郁情绪的风险因素[J].国际精神病学杂志,2023,50(5):1125-1131.
[3] 韩宇,常越,田瑶,等.临床护理路径在支气管哮喘合并肺结核护理中的应用[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(z1):179-181.
[4] 谢艺红,汪利果.基于管理团队＋质控小组的规范化延续性护理模式在支气管哮喘患儿中的应用[J].国际护理学杂志,2024,43(1):173-177.
[5] 安璐,于晓婷,李晶晶,等.基于司职协作模式的集束化护理对支气管哮喘儿童肺功能与哮喘控制效果的影响[J].河北医药,2024,46(16):2547-2553.
[6] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘防治指南（2020年版）[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2020,43(12):1023-1048.
[7] 耿秀娟,孔灵菲.支气管哮喘的分级治疗[J].中国实用内科杂志（临床版）,2006,26(1):63-64.
[8] 于淼,马金凤,陈玮.思维导图引导5E康复护理在支气管哮喘患者中的应用效果[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(18):65-68.
[9] 李宁秀,唐敏,王治军,等.患者遵医行为研究[J].现代预防医学,2001,28(1):60-61.
[10] 周亚丽,张焕梅,刘小凡,等.构建支气管哮喘患者护理质量评价指标体系[J].护理学报,2021,28(15):63-68.
[11] 徐洁,李晓明,王欣.基于FMEA模式的康复护理对支气管哮喘急性发作患者的疗效[J].临床与病理杂志,2022,42(1):166-171.
[12] 郭林林.基于ACT反馈的延续性护理对支气管哮喘患者肺功能、哮喘发作与治疗依从性的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2020,17(4):59-61.
[13] 郭继荣.支气管哮喘患者应用延续性护理对临床效果、依从性及满意度的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(22):4205-4208.
[14] Talaat E, Mahrous FM, Abdelsalam SN. Effect Of Educational Programme On Patients With Bronchial Asthma Regarding Self -Care Management[J]. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;73(Suppl 4)(4):S233-S237.
[15] 刘桂森,马悦霞,贺子娟,等.肺康复护理在支气管哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠患者中的应用价值研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2021,30(26):2950-2954.
[16] 姚洁林,孙雪洁,张玉玲,等.基于冰山理论的护理干预用于支气管哮喘患者的临床观察[J].护理实践与研究,2022,19(22):3317-3321.