Paper Infomation
Research on Subject Areas of Innovation Ecosystems: A Discipline Co-occurrence Analysis
Full Text(PDF, 719KB)
Author: Pengbin Gao, Jianxin Zhao, Xue Li
Abstract: Based on data from the Web of Science database, co-occurrence analysis and network visualization technique were conducted to explore the structure and patterns of interdisciplinary collaborations in innovation ecosystem research. This study presented the descriptive statistics of disciplines involved in relative research and interdisciplinary network over time. The results suggested that the scope of disciplines involved in innovation ecosystem research is broad and the distribution is unbalanced. Management and business are the core subject area while Regional & Urban Planning, Environmental Studies, and Environmental Sciences are playing key role in research and practices.
Keywords: Innovation Ecosystem Research, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Discipline Co-Occurrence Analysis
References:
[1] Traitler H, Watzke H J, Saguy I S. Reinventing R&D in an open innovation ecosystem[J]. Journal of food science, 2011, 76(2): R62-R68.
[2] Oh D S, Phillips F, Park S, et al. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination[J]. Technovation, 2016, 54: 1-6.
[3] Bassis N F, Armellini F. Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: a literature review in search of complementarities[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2018, 28(5): 1053-1080.
[4] Rabelo R J, Bernus P. A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, 48(3): 2250-2257.
[5] Iyawa G E, Herselman M, Botha A. Digital health innovation ecosystems: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 100: 244-252.
[6] Dedehayir O, Mäkinen S J, Ortt J R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 18-29.
[7] Zhang C, Guan J. How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(2): 1177-1197.
[8] de Vasconcelos Gomes L A, Facin A L F, Salerno M S, et al. Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 30-48.
[9] Meng Y, Ma Y. Innovation Ecosystem Analysis 1986-2017: A Citation-Based Literature Survey[J]. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2018, 8(11): 2231-2255.
[10] Suominen A, Seppänen M, Dedehayir O. A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, 22(2): 335-360.
[11] Yao Q, Chen K, Yao L, et al. Scientometric trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research[J]. Health research policy and systems, 2014, 12(1): 26.
[12] Van Eck N J, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523-538.