HomePage >> Journals >> Management Science and Research

Management Science and Research

Management Science and Research is an international comprehensive professional academic journal of Ivy Publisher, concerning the development of management science technology and research, on the combination of management science theory and modern industrial technology. The main focus of the journal is the academic papers and comments of latest management science theory and method research improvement in the fields of nature science, engineering t... [More] Management Science and Research is an international comprehensive professional academic journal of Ivy Publisher, concerning the development of management science technology and research, on the combination of management science theory and modern industrial technology. The main focus of the journal is the academic papers and comments of latest management science theory and method research improvement in the fields of nature science, engineering technology, economy and science, report of latest research result in the field of material subject, aiming at providing a good communication platform to transfer, share and discuss the theoretical and technical development of management science for professionals, scholars and researchers in this field, reflecting the academic front level, promote academic change and foster the rapid expansion of management science theory and application technology.

The journal receives manuscripts written in Chinese or English. As for Chinese papers, the following items in English are indispensible parts of the paper: paper title, author(s), author(s)'affiliation(s), abstract and keywords. If this is the first time you contribute an article to the journal, please format your manuscript as per the sample paper and then submit it into the online submission system. Accepted papers will immediately appear online followed by printed hard copies by Ivy Publisher globally. Therefore, the contributions should not be related to secret. The author takes sole responsibility for his views.

ISSN Print:2326-8689

ISSN Online:2326-8727

Email:msr@ivypub.org

Website: http://www.ivypub.org/msr/

  0
  0

Paper Infomation

Research Progress on Open Innovation and Innovation Performance of Agricultural Enterprises in the Context of Digital Transformation

Full Text(PDF, 300KB)

Author: Linlin Xu, Jianping Lv

Abstract: Based on the related literature of open innovation of agricultural enterprises under the background of digital transformation, this paper analyzes the basic concept, type and dimensional division of open innovation, pre-impact factors, and the research status of innovation performance. It is pointed out that open innovation focuses on the acquisition, transformation, utilization and commercialization of internal and external resources, which is affected by the internal organizational environment such as organizational atmosphere and organizational resources, and the external institutional environment such as government regulation and industry norms. The influencing factors of innovation performance are diverse, including the mechanism of knowledge sharing and protection within the enterprise, the market operation environment, the government policy environment, open innovation and the mediating or regulating role of dynamic ability. In general, under the background of digital transformation, new requirements are put forward for the research of open innovation. It is still of profound theoretical and practical significance to explore the antecedent variables and outcome variables of inward-oriented and outward-oriented open innovation in the future.

Keywords: Open Innovation, Innovation Performance, Research Progress

References:

[1] 温涛,陈一明.数字经济与农业农村经济融合发展:实践模式、现实障碍与突破路径[J].农业经济问题,2020(07):118-129.

[2] 罗屹,苗海民,黄东等.农户仓类设施采纳及其对玉米储存数量和损失的影响[J].资源科学,2020,42(09):1777-1787.

[3] McGahan Anita M., Bogers Marcel L. A. M., Chesbrough Henry, Holgersson Marcus. Tackling Societal Challenges with Open Innovation [J]. California Management Review. 2021(2).

[4] Ellen Enkel, Marcel Bogers, Henry Chesbrough. Exploring open innovation in the digital age: A maturity model and future research directions [J]. R&D Management. 2020(1).

[5] Katarzyna Walecka-Jankowska, Joanna Zimmer. Open innovation in the context of organisational strategy [J]. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2019(3).

[6] Carrasco Carvajal, Omar, Castillo Vergara, Mauricio, García Pérez de Lema, Domingo. Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research [J]. Review of Managerial Science. 2022 (prep).

[7] Henry Chesbrough. The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property [J]. California Management Review. 2003(3).

[8] Lihten thaler. Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions [J]. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2011(1).

[9] Krogh Georg, Wallin Martin W., Woerter Martin. External Knowledge and Information Technology: Implications for Process Innovation Performance [J]. MIS Quarterly. 2017 (1).

[10] McGahan Anita M., Bogers Marcel L. A. M., Chesbrough Henry, Holgersson Marcus. Tackling Societal Challenges with Open Innovation [J]. California Management Review. 2021(2).

[11] Ting Liu, Liu Tang. Open innovation from the perspective of network embedding: knowledge evolution and development trend [J]. Scientometrics. 2020 (prep).

[12] Carrasco Carvajal, Omar, Castillo Vergara, Mauricio, García Pérez de Lema, Domingo. Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research [J]. Review of Managerial Science. 2022 (prep).

[13] HenryChesbrough, Adrienne Kardon Crowther. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries [J]. R&D Management. 2006(3).

[14] Wang Chengang, Wei Yingqi. Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance[J]. Research Policy. 2021 (1).

[15] Schuhmacher Alexander, Gassmann Oliver, McCracken Nigel, Hinder Markus. Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making? [J]. Journal of translational medicine. 2018(1).

[16] Wang Chengang, Wei Yingqi. Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance [J]. Research Policy. 2021(1).

[17] Jennifer Lehmann. Innovation: Are we really creating something new? [J]. Children Australia. 2019(1).

[18] Chinho Lin, Hua-Ling Tsai. Achieving a firm’s competitive advantage through dynamic capability [J]. Baltic Journal of Management. 2016(3).

[19] Trantopoulos Konstantinos, von Krogh Georg, Wallin Martin W., Woerter Martin. External Knowledge and Information Technology: Implications for Process Innovation Performance [J]. MIS Quarterly. 2017(1).

[20] Giagnocavo Cynthia, de CaraGarcía Miguel, González Mónica, Juan Melchor, MarínGuirao José Ignacio, Mehrabi Sepide, Rodríguez Estefanía, van der Blom Jan, Crisol Martínez Eduardo. Reconnecting Farmers with Nature through Agroecological Transitions: Interacting Niches and Experimentation and the Role of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems [J]. Agriculture. 2022 (2).

[21] Muhammad Mumtaz Khan, Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, Tahir Islam. Leading the innovation: role of trust and job crafting as sequential mediators relating servant leadership and innovative work behavior [J]. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2020(5).

[22] Schuemputer J A, Schuemputer J 5etal. The theory of economics development of Political Economy,1934,1(2):170-172.

[23] H. Emre Yildiz, Adis Murtic, Magnus Klofsten, Udo, Anders Richtnér. Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective[J]. Technovation. 2020 (prep).

[24] Mandana Farzaneh, Peivand Ghasemzadeh, Jamal A. Nazari, Gholamhossein Mehralian. Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance [J]. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2020 (ahea).

[25] Beatriz Forés, César Camisón. Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? [J]. Journal of Business Research. 2015.

[26] Veronica Scuotto, Orlando Beatrice, Cillo Valentina, Melita Nicotra, Leonardo Di Gioia, Massimiliano Farina Briamonte. Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2020(C).

[27] Odysseas Lamtzidis, Dennis Pettas, John Gialelis. A Novel Combination of Distributed Ledger Technologies on Internet of Things: Use Case on Precision Agriculture [J]. Applied System Innovation. 2019(3).

[28] Beatriz Forés, César Camisón.Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? [J]. Journal of Business Research. 2015.

[29] Ovuakporie Oghogho Destina, Pillai Kishore Gopalakrishna, Wang Chengang, Wei Yingqi. Differential moderating effects of strategic and operational reconfiguration on the relationship between open innovation practices and innovation performance [J]. Research Policy. 2021(1).

[30] Ruijie Li, Lihua Fu, Zhiying Liu. Does openness to innovation matter? The moderating role of open innovation between organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance [J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 2020(2).

[31] Lorenzo Ardito, Simon Raby, Vito Albino, Bernardo Bertoldi. The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance [J]. Journal of Business Research. 2021.

[32] 耿瑞利,申静.基于开放式创新的智库知识管理模DOI:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.02.016.

[33] 苏鑫,彭新永,赵越.开放式创新驱动战略性新兴产业高端化——研究综述与分析框架构建[J].技术经济与管理研究,2019(12):115-118.

[34] 马文甲,张琳琳,巩丽娟.外向型开放式创新导向与模式的匹配对企业绩效的影响[J].中国软科学,2020(02):167-173.

[35] 任之光,高鹏斌.双向开放式创新及其协同、商业模式和企业创新绩效的关系研究[J].管理评论,2020,32(08):116-130.

[36] 周兰,姚星齐,刘泽华.CEO财务经历与企业创新——基于风险认知和融资能力的双重视角[J].南方经济,2021(08):66-85.

[37] 谭云清,原海英,马永生,翟森竞.资源约束、知识搜索对企业开放式创新影响[J].科研管理,2017,38(S1):641-649.

[38] 岳鹄,朱怀念,张光宇,刘怡新.网络关系、合作伙伴差异性对开放式创新绩效的交互影响研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(07):1018-1024.

[39] 杨慧珊,王刊良,杨平.开放式创新视角下企业创新路径选择与影响因素研究[J].技术与创新管理,2019,40(04):441-447+516.

[40] 李辉.组织学习能力、开放式创新与创新绩效的转化机制研究——以知识密集型服务企业为样本[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(02):89-97. DOI:10.16797/j.cnki.11-5224/c.20190410.013.

[41] 王艳子,王聪荣.长三角地区民营企业在开放式创新过程中的知识转化研究——知识资产管理视角[J].现代管理科学,2019(05):66-68.

[42] 张龙鹏,汤志伟.企业信息技术应用对开放式创新的影响:交易成本视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(20):79-87.

[43] 周飞,冉茂刚,苏秋来.资源组拼、未吸收冗余与内向型开放式创新的关系研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(05):703-709.

[44] 陈朝月,许治.政府研发资助不同方式对企业开放式创新的影响探究[J].管理学报,2018,15(11):1655-1662.

[45] 冯长利,程悦.开放式创新与企业绩效的Meta分析[J].科研管理,2020,41(01):108-118.

[46] 姜滨滨,匡海波.基于“效率-产出”的企业创新绩效评价——文献评述与概念框架[J].科研管理,2015,36(03):71-78.

[47] 解学梅,王宏伟.网络嵌入对企业创新绩效的影响机理:一个基于非研发创新的有调节中介模型[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(06):13-28.

[48] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010(05):118-129.

[49] 袁磊,杨虹,何艳青.国内外大型先进企业开放式创新的动因与模式[J].石油科技论坛,2015,34(04):25-31.

[50] 李桂华,赵珊,王亚.供应网络位置、吸收能力与企业创新绩效[J].软科学,2020,34(12):1-7.

[51] 杨立生,陈倩.开放式创新、知识积累与高新技术企业半突破性创新绩效[J].云南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2020,29(05):519-526.

[52] 牛思佳,沈雷.数字化转型下服装品牌营销渠道的策略分析[J].毛纺科技,2020,48(04):70-74.

[53] 尚勇敏,周冯琦,林兰.开放式创新对节能环保企业创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(10):114-122.

[54] 王婕佳.“开放式创新”下合作伙伴异质性对创新绩效的影响研究[J].才智,2020(02):75.

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2011-2024 Ivy Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

Contact: customer@ivypub.org