您所在的位置: 首页 >> 期刊 >> 教育研究前沿

教育研究前沿

《教育研究前沿》是一本关注教育学科最新进展的开源国际学术期刊。本刊采用开放获取模式,报道与探讨教育实践、教育理论和教育研究等相关问题,旨在反映教育学科前沿进展及水平,促进学术交流。为国内外教育学科领域的师生、科研人员、行政管理人员以及图书馆工作人员等提供一个良好的交流平台,以推进我国教育事业的发展。本刊可接收中、英文稿件。但中文稿件要有详细的英文标题、作者、单位、摘要和关键词。初次投稿请按照稿件模板排版后在线投稿。录用稿件首先刊发在期…… 【更多】 《教育研究前沿》是一本关注教育学科最新进展的开源国际学术期刊。本刊采用开放获取模式,报道与探讨教育实践、教育理论和教育研究等相关问题,旨在反映教育学科前沿进展及水平,促进学术交流。为国内外教育学科领域的师生、科研人员、行政管理人员以及图书馆工作人员等提供一个良好的交流平台,以推进我国教育事业的发展。

本刊可接收中、英文稿件。但中文稿件要有详细的英文标题、作者、单位、摘要和关键词。初次投稿请按照稿件模板排版后在线投稿。录用稿件首先刊发在期刊网站上,然后由Ivy Publisher出版公司高质量出版,面向全球公开发行。因此,要求来稿均不涉密,文责自负。

ISSN Print:2168-2453

ISSN Online:2168-247X

Email:erf@ivypub.org

Website: http://www.ivypub.org/erf

  0
  0

Paper Infomation

Practice of Massive Open Online Courses and Existed Problems

Full Text(PDF, 434KB)

Author: Lin Qiao, Juan He

Abstract: As a way of education process reengineering, massive open online courses increase efficiencies in knowledge dissemination and knowledge creation enormously due to the characteristics of openness, massiveness, accessibility and frugalness, and represent the onward direction of the profound amalgamation of technology and education. Massive open online courses make subversive changes in education with a higher degree of probability, which have vast importance to promote equality in education. This paper indicates that massive open online courses is an important supplement to traditional modes of instruction, an impactful method of enhancing the quality of citizens, and an effective approach to lifelong learning for citizens. However, during the practice of massive open online courses, some teaching problems, such as heavier burden of teaching and lower quality of teaching, must be solved. Meanwhile, potential intellectual property issues should be also taken into account in running massive open online courses.

Keywords: Massive Open Online Course; Pedagogy; Higher Education; Intellectual Property

References:

[1] Yuan, Songhe, and Liu, Xuan. “Status and Common Problems of MOOC Practice in China's Universities — From the Reports of the MOOC Practice in China's Universities.” Modern Distance Education Research. 2014, (4): 3-12, 22

[2] Zeng Xiaojie. “The Rise of MOOC in US Universities and Its Challenge to Traditional Higher Education.” Comparative Education Review. 2014, (7): 32-40

[3] Barber, Michael, Donnelly, Katelyn, and Rizvi, Saad. “An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead.” 2013. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. http://www.ippr.org/publications/an-avalanche-is-coming-higher-education-and-the-revolution-ahead

[4] Shang, Junjie. “Education Process Reengineering: MOOC and Reform of Higher Education.” Beijing Forum 2013, The Harmony of Civilizations and Prosperity for All — Retrospect and Prospect. Beijing, China, Nov 1-3 2013, 240-252. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. http://www.tju.edu.cn/tjucfd/jlpt/wxck/jyjx/201403/P020140327413235656014.pdf

[5] Pappano, Laura. “How Online Learning Is Reinventing College.” The Christian Science Monitor, Jun 2, 2013. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0602/How-online-learning-is-reinventing-college

[6] Johnson, Larry, and Becker, Samantha A. “Enter the Anti-MOOCs: The Reinvention of Online Learning as a Form of Social Commentary.” Internet Learning. 2014, 3(2): 5-20. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. http://digitalcommons.apus.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1038&context=internetlearning

[7] Strauss, Valerie. “The big misunderstanding about MOOCs.” The Washington Post. Feb 24, 2013. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/02/24/the-great-divide-over-moocs/

[8] Kolowich, Steve. “Conflicted: Faculty and Online Education, 2012.” Inside Higher Ed. Jun 21, 2012. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/survey/conflicted-faculty-and-online-education-2012

[9] The Philosophy Department, San Jose State University. “An Open Letter to Professor Michael Sandel from the Philosophy Department at San Jose State U.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. May 2, 2013. Accessed Jun 5, 2016. http://chronicle.com/ article/The-Document-Open-Letter-From/138937/

[10] Wang, Yonggu, and Zhang, Qing. “MOOC:Characteristics and Learning Mechanism.” Education Research. 2014, (9): 112-120, 133

[11] Wu, Jiang, and Ma, Panhao. “Knowledge Flow Research in MOOC Platform Based on Super Network.” Library & Information. 2015, (6): 97-106

[12] Zheng, Yanlin, Ma, Shijing, and Liu, Shuang. “Path Choice for the Development of MOOC under SMCR Model.” China Audiovisual Education. 2014, (10): 36-41, 64

[13] Wang, Jide, Feng, Yingying, and Wang, Ying. “Calm Reflections on the Upsurge of MOOC.” Education Research. 2014, (9): 104-111

[14] Gao, Di, and Wu, Tong. “Several Frontier Issues in the Theoretical Study of the MOOCs and Its Practice in the USA.” Journal of Higher Education Management. 2014, 8(4): 49-54

[15] Jia, Hongwei, and Ma, Defeng. “Problems Concerning MOOC’s Development in China.” Journal of Hubei Engineering University, 2014, 34(4): 76-80

[16] Li, Junlong, Wang, Li, Fu, Leiming, and Ding, Yongqian. “The Strategic Choice of MOOC Teaching in Colleges from the Perspective of AGIL Model.” Modern Distance Education Research. 2016, (2): 53-60

[17] McClure, Maureen W. “Investing in MOOCs: ‘Frenemy’ Risk and Information Quality.” In Globalisation and Higher Education Reforms, Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research 15, edited by Zajda. Joseph, and Rust, Val., 77-94. Switzerland: Springer, 2016

[18] Fox, Robert. “MOOC Impact beyond Innovation.” In Reforming Learning and Teaching in Asia-Pacific Universities, Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects 33, edited by Ng, Chi-hung Clarence, Fox, Robert, and Nakano, Michiko, 159-172. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore, 2016

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2011-2024 Ivy Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

Contact: customer@ivypub.org