Paper Infomation
Research on Cultivating Innovation Literacy of Graduate Students Majoring in Economics and Management Based on the International Accreditation Concept of Business Schools
Full Text(PDF, 41KB)
Author: Pengbin Gao, Qi Zhang, Yiduo Song, Yexin Liu
Abstract: International certification has become an important way for business schools to enhance their competitive advantage and promote sustainable development, and its certification system standards provide important references for the development of business schools. This study introduces the three major accreditation systems of AACSB, EQUIS, and AMBA and their basic concepts. Based on the latest 2023 version of the standard, this study analyzes their respective requirements in terms of innovation. Based on integrating the common characteristics of the three major accreditation systems, a cultivation strategy for innovative literacy of graduate students in the field of economics and management is proposed from the perspectives of college management and teacher guidance.
Keywords: AACSB, EQUIS, AMBA, Business School, Graduate Student, Innovation Literacy
References:
[1] Corona R., Mazo-Cuervo D.M. The Challenges for AACSB Accreditation at CEIPA Business School: Adapting New Standards for a Continuous Improvement Process[J]. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2018, 9(2): 111-117.
[2] Zhao J., Zhao S.Y. Business analytics programs offered by AACSB-accredited US colleges of business: A web mining study[J]. Journal of Education for Business, 2016, 91(6): 327-337.
[3] George B.P. Choosing the right kind of accreditation for a business school: A comparison between AACSB, ACBSP, and IACBE[J]. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 2018, 2(2): 45-61.
[4] Sziegat, H. The response of German business schools to international accreditation in global competition[J]. Quality Assurance in Education, 2021,29(2/3): 135-150.
[5] Morgan J. The Impact of AACSB Business School Accreditation on Quality of Accounting Education as Measured by CPA Exam Success Rates[J]. Business Education Digest, 2011 ,18:1-10
[6] Bryant M. International accreditations as drivers of business school quality improvement[J]. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 2013, 24(3-4): 155-167.
[7] Wu Y., Wu C. International Accreditations as Drivers of MBA Education Improvement-A Case of GWMBA[J]. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2017, 4(23):1-14
[8] Morgan J, Bergin J. L., Sallee L. Three Types of Business School Accreditation and their Relationships to CPA Exam Scores of Graduates[J]. Advances in Business Research, 2012,3(1):25-35.
[9] Chang, Y.S., Lin, K.J. & Tu, T.W. The Impact of AACSB Accreditation on Business School Students in Taiwan[J]. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.2016, 25: 615–625.
[10] 侯玉.新时代大学生创新素养培育路径探析[J].中国成人教育, 2019,24:4.
[11] 董雪玲,姜浩,王英滨,等.大学化学教学中创新素养培养途径的探索[J].化学教育, 2016, 37(20):5.
[12] 李润洲.研究生创新素养培育的教学审视——一种教育学的视角[J]. 2019,1:39-44.
[13] 张先彬.自由学习:培育学生创新素养之策略[J].中国教育学刊, 2010(12):3.
[14] 沈之菲.提升学生创新素养的高阶思维教学[J].上海教育科研, 2011(9):4
[15] 师保国,高云峰,马玉赫.STEAM教育对学生创新素养的影响及其实施策略[J]. 2017,4:75-79.
[16] 张睿.高校拔尖创新人才创新素养的现状及其对创造力的影响研究——以全国"挑战杯"获奖者为例[J].复旦教育论坛,2019, 17(6):8.
[17] 张蕾.基于创新素养提升的大学生创新创业生态系统运行路径研究[J].中国职业技术教育, 2021(28):5.